Forgotten Soldiers: The War of 1812 in the North

During the thirty months that the War of 1812 lasted, the heaviest fighting took place along the northern border of the United States, between Lake Champlain and Buffalo. Forgotten Soldiers is a three-volume trilogy that tells the story of the military campaigns that took place in this area from the spring of 1813 to the end of the war and of the men of all nations who fought in them. Two volumes have already been published -- Volume 1 is Field of Glory: The Battle of Crysler's Farm, 1813 and Volume 2 is Where Right and Glory Lead: The Battle of Lundy's Lane, 1814 -- and a third volume is in preparation. The second volume is described below.

 

 

Cover-Right-Glory.jpg

Publisher: Robin Brass Studio, Toronto, 1997

ISBN: I-896941-03-6

Details: Quality softcover; 332 pages, 6" x 9"; about 70 illustrations and maps; notes; bibliography; index; appendices with detailed orders of battle

Suggested Retail Price (may vary):
$18.95 Cdn/ $16.95 US

 

First published in 1993 as The Battle of Lundy's Lane. On the Niagara in 1814, this book was a selection of the Military Book Club that year. In 1997, a revised edition with the title Where Right and Glory Lead! appeared and is a study of the two most hard-fought battles of the War of 1812: Chippawa fought on 5 July 1814 and Lundy's Lane fought on 25 July 1814. In its 5th printing, Where Right and Glory Lead! has become a minor classic, one British historian describing it 'as the best book about a battle ever written."

 

 

Excerpt from Where Right and Glory Lead!
copyright ©1993, 1997 by Donald E. Graves and must not be reproduced without the author's permission.

In the early evening of 25 July 1814, after Brigadier General Winfield Scott's brigade had been decimated by the British artillery on the low hill which formed the centre of Drummond's position at Lundy's Lane, there was a lull in the battle. During this period, Major General Jacob Brown arrived from his camp with Brigadier General Eleazar Ripley's regular brigade and Brigadier General Peter B. Porters volunteer brigade. Having scouted the British positions, Brown decided that he would have to attack the British artillery or withdraw from the field. He decided to attack and rode to the position of Lieutenant Colonel James Miller's 21st United States Infantry ......

He found them in line along the track running west from the Peer house where, under the eye of their tall Commander, they had just knocked down a rail fence bordering the track in preparation for their advance against the British guns. James Miller was a thirty-eight-year-old native of New Hampshire described as "a rare union of personal excellency of character with a strength and firmness of mind and body." ...... A large, physically imposing man with a modest manner, Miller was a competent, singleminded and aggressive soldier and a good choice to lead the crucial attack.

Drawing up beside him, Brown said, "Col. Miller, take your Regiment and storm that work and take it." The tall, taciturn officer "raised his herculean form and fixed his eye, for an instant, intently upon the battery; then turning his bit of tobacco," gave a reply that was to become the stuff of American schoolboy legend - "I'll try, Sir!" Before Miller could move, however, the First Infantry attacked the hill.

Although the First was the senior infantry regiment of the American army, it had not seen much action during the war but had remained dispersed in small frontier posts in the western territories. In the early summer of 1814 its widely-scattered companies had been consolidated and it was ordered to join the Left Division. The regiment was pitifully under strength. In his own words, Nicholas brought only a "detachment" of three companies totalling one hundred and fifty men into action. To march such a small unit into the middle of a hard-fought and confusing night action might have daunted a lesser man but the Virginian Nicholas was a strong-minded individual "who always inspires his troops with heroic ardor and who dares, without fear of slander to use caution where he thinks caution adviseable."

1-Glengarry.JPG
Painting by G.A. Embleton,
courtesy Parks Canda

Following Ripley from camp, the First had cleared the chestnut wood, and halted on the Portage Road while Nicholas, who knew none of the senior officers present, tried to get some orders. The British guns had ceased firing but he was told to get his men off the road because their presence would draw artillery fire. Nicholas moved into the fields west of the road, where he met Winfield Scott, who pointed out to him the location of the enemy artillery and the necessity of attacking it. Wood then rode up and conducted him to a point west of the orchard behind the Peer house. McRee arrived next and informed Nicholas that the Twenty-First, on his right, were about to attack the British battery and that he was to move "to the left and form a line facing the enemy on the heights with a view to drawing off his force and attracting his attention." As his company formed up, thirty-four-year-old Captain John Symmes from the Michigan Territory, concerned that his green soldiers would prove unequal to the task, scrutinized their faces closely while giving them "a few exciting words" and was reassured by the resolve he saw reflected there.

Although Brown's intention had only been for Nicholas to mount a demonstration, his order must have been garbled in transmission because the Virginian led his regiment straight at the British artillery. From their position on the hill, Maclachlan's gunners could see little of the southern slope and the fields in front. The smoke of battle had cleared and the moon was low in the southwest sky, but it did not illuminate the lower slopes the hill, which were shrouded in darkness. The gunners could, however, clearly hear the shout of orders and the sounds of marching troops as Ripley's brigade deployed and occasionally they would fire a round to the Americans on the qui vive. ....... Aware that something was happening to their front but uncertain what it was, Maclachlan and his men loaded their guns and waited.

As the First Infantry advanced in line out of the darkness in front of the British guns, Maclachlan opened a furious fire with canister and round shot. Fortunately for the Americans, the British gunners' elevation was too high and most of the rounds passed harmlessly overhead. With Nicholas and his adjutant, Lieutenant John A. Shaw, both mounted and urging them on, the First moved closer to the British guns. The gunners corrected their aim and now the Americans began to take casualties ...... As the fire intensified, Nicholas realized that it would be suicidal for his tiny unit to attack straight into the muzzles of the British guns. Concluding that there "was no possibility of my annoying the enemy and a certainty of his destroying my men," the Virginian ordered the First Infantry to "right about face" and march back down the hill. Ignoring a staff officer who shouted, "Where are you going?" Nicholas then reformed his regiment in line at the base of the hill.

1-Lundymap.jpg
Map courtesy William Constable

His abortive attack had not been in vain; it had drawn the attention Maclachlan's gunners, and in the noise and confusion of the First Infantryt's advance and retreat, they failed to hear or see the approach of Miller's Twenty-First Infantry up the southeast slope of the hill. ......

It was about 9:15 P.m. when the Twenty-First moved quietly up the hill, in a line of two ranks, with their "bayonets at a charge ." The muzzle flashes of the British guns firing at the First Infantry illuminated the faces of the advancing men and one later admitted that as he climbed he felt "damned bashful." For much of their progress up the steeper southeast slope of the hill, the Twenty-First were moving in "dead" ground and invisible to the British gunners and the infantry behind them. There were no enemy skirmishers to impede or warn of their advance and in a few moments they had reached the old rail fence overgrown with shrubbery that surrounded the cemetery and the meeting house. They were now about a hundred feet from the muzzles of the guns and could see the gunners' "port fires and slow matches burning and ready." Miller "very cautiously" ordered his men "to rest [their muskets] across the fence, take good aim, fire & rush."

Maclachlan had ceased firing at the First Infantry, who had disappeared into the blackness at the bottom of the hill. His subordinate, Mackonochie, had just arrived from the Twelve-Mile Creek bringing three 6-pdr. guns and the two gunners were probably too involved in the process of positioning these pieces, while the gun detachments were intently watching where the First Infantry had disappeared, to notice the quiet movement of the Twenty-First to the cemetery fence. The American were spotted at the last moment - Norton was conversing with two officers when one of them "enquired what Body of men it might be that were approaching." Going towards them, Norton "observed the Moon glimmer faintly on the plates of their Caps, the form of which denounced them to be our Enemies, - before I could speak, they fired."

The well-directed American volley cut down Maclachlan's startled gunners so that "not one man at the cannons was left to put fire to them." Maclachlan was wounded and nearly twenty of his men became casualties. Before the dazed survivors could react, the Twenty-First, with Miller and their colours in the lead, pushed the rail fence flat, charged and were in among the gun detachments with their bayonets. The "fight was but for a moment" and most of the British gunners either fled or surrendered. ......

 

What Reviewers say about Where Right and Glory Lead!

Graves presents an unparalleled analysis of how this confusing and complicated night battle unfolded, and in the process deftly cuts through conflicting contemporary reports, especially on how the British regained their captured artillery at the end of the battle. [Where Right and Glory Lead] like Field of Glory, shows that no one is better than Graves at penetrating the fog and friction of war, and both of these volumes are must reading for anyone who wants to understand the military history of the War of 1812.
Donald Hickey, "The Top 25 Books of the War of 1812," War of 1812 Magazine, Issue 7, September 2007

 

Amazon 5-star rating
"I would not recommend this book for anyone who has only a passing interest in the War of 1812 but for those who already know of the rudiments of the war and desire a more in depth analysis then it is fantastic. Graves leaves nothing to be guessed at. The narration is in great detail, almost to the point of being cumberson, but in the end, it is all worth it."
Jeff Scott, Amazon Reviews

 

"With the revisions that take into account recent scholarship, Where Right and Glory Lead! is now more than ever the definitive account of the Battle of Lundy's Lane."
Doug Gates, Canadian Military History, Spring 1999

"Lundy's Lane is one of those battles you know about, but really don't know about. ...... What author Graves has been able to do is sift through a mountain of primary written material" to "craft a highly readable and convincing account of events."
Fred Gaede, Military Historian, Fall 1999

"a vivid and scholarly account of ... a desperate and extraordinary night battle, written by a master of the military techniques of the day ... an enjoyable and compelling read."
Piers Mackesy, author of The War for America, 1775-1783

"An excellent tactical study of a Napoleonic period battle."
David Chandler, author of The Campaigns of Napoleon

"how military history should be written -- deeply and carefully researched, salted with common sense, and put in a prose that stands you in a firing line that is fraying thinner by the minute."
John Elting, author of Swords Around a Throne

"an exercise in military history at its best."
Dennis Showalter, History Book Club

"comprehensive and compelling ...... Meticulously documented, cogently argued, this book alone will secure Graves's reputation among military historians."
James Elliott, Hamilton Spectator

"The battle is told in great detail, and the key characters enter and depart from the scene in a fashion characteristic of great historical narrative. ...... it is a matter of celebration of find a superb history of one such battle ...... an excellent example of the 'sharp end' of military history."
Barry Gough, Canadian Military History, Autumn 1994

"Graves is also a master of detail. He has marshalled thousands of facts into one coherent picture, judiciously mixing an impressive knowledge of all things military with anecdote and even dialogue taken from the diaries, memoirs and official records of a surprising number of men who partook in the actual battle. The voices of the dead speak for themselves; their words give the book a welcome ring of authenticity and human intimacy. ...... read Donald Graves's brilliant and exciting and sometimes surprising interpretation of the greatest battle ever to have taken place on Canadian soil. His book is a rare and welcome achievement."
Michael Power, Brock Review, 1994, No. 3

"Graves narrates a complete account of the battle in a highly readable style. ...... Graves's notes on the terminology of the period are neither pedantic nor pedestrian, the accompanying maps are perfectly placed and executed ... and his eyewitness accounts are intuitively chosen, each ringing true."
Ian McCulloch, Beaver, October/November 1994

"Through diligent research and an ability to look upon the events with a detachment rarely seen in an historian writing about the history of his own country, Graves has stripped away those layers of legend and has allowed us to see the battle as it really was for the first time. ...... the definitive work on the Battle of Lundy's Lane and all that have preceded must be measured against it. ...... a must read for history buffs and the casual reader alike."
Robert Foley, Weekender, 30 October 1994

"entertaining history that delves into what made both armies of that time tick. It is as much an account of soldiers in battle as the battle itself."
Fort Worth Daily Republic, 25 April 1994

"a most lucid description of weaponry, drill, equipment, and unit terminology ... augmented by clear, uncluttered maps. ...... It will be the chief source work on the battle for years to come. General readers, undergraduates, and above."
L.E. Babits, Choice, February 1994

"evokes, even more than Keegan, the full texture of a battle and its relationship to the conflict of which it was a part. Graves's devotion to this particular event is evident in the extensive research, textured prose, and deft analysis that engages the reader."
David Skaggs, Journal of the Early American Republic, Spring 1994

Return.jpg