First published in 1993
as The Battle of Lundy's Lane. On the Niagara in 1814, this book was
a selection of the Military Book Club that year. In 1997, a revised
edition with the title Where Right and Glory Lead! appeared
and is a study of the two most hard-fought battles of the War of 1812:
Chippawa fought on 5 July 1814 and Lundy's Lane fought on 25 July
1814. In its 5th printing, Where Right and Glory Lead! has
become a minor classic, one British historian describing it 'as the
best book about a battle ever written."
Excerpt from Where
Right and Glory Lead!
copyright
©1993, 1997 by Donald E. Graves and must not be reproduced without
the author's permission.
In the
early evening of 25 July 1814, after Brigadier General Winfield Scott's
brigade had been decimated by the British artillery on the low hill
which formed the centre of Drummond's position at Lundy's Lane, there
was a lull in the battle. During this period, Major General Jacob
Brown arrived from his camp with Brigadier General Eleazar Ripley's
regular brigade and Brigadier General Peter B. Porters volunteer brigade.
Having scouted the British positions, Brown decided that he would
have to attack the British artillery or withdraw from the field. He
decided to attack and rode to the position of Lieutenant Colonel James
Miller's 21st United States Infantry ......
He found them in line along the track running west from the
Peer house where, under the eye of their tall Commander, they had
just knocked down a rail fence bordering the track in preparation
for their advance against the British guns. James Miller was a thirty-eight-year-old
native of New Hampshire described as "a rare union of personal excellency
of character with a strength and firmness of mind and body." ......
A large, physically imposing man with a modest manner, Miller was
a competent, singleminded and aggressive soldier and a good choice
to lead the crucial attack.
Drawing up beside him, Brown said, "Col. Miller, take
your Regiment and storm that work and take it." The tall,
taciturn officer "raised his herculean form and fixed his
eye, for an instant, intently upon the battery; then turning
his bit of tobacco," gave a reply that was to become the
stuff of American schoolboy legend - "I'll try, Sir!" Before
Miller could move, however, the First Infantry attacked
the hill.
Although the First was the senior infantry regiment
of the American army, it had not seen much action during
the war but had remained dispersed in small frontier posts
in the western territories. In the early summer of 1814
its widely-scattered companies had been consolidated and
it was ordered to join the Left Division. The regiment was
pitifully under strength. In his own words, Nicholas brought
only a "detachment" of three companies totalling one hundred
and fifty men into action. To march such a small unit into
the middle of a hard-fought and confusing night action might
have daunted a lesser man but the Virginian Nicholas was
a strong-minded individual "who always inspires his troops
with heroic ardor and who dares, without fear of slander
to use caution where he thinks caution adviseable."
|
Painting
by G.A. Embleton,
courtesy Parks Canda
|
Following Ripley from camp, the First had cleared
the chestnut wood, and halted on the Portage Road while Nicholas,
who knew none of the senior officers present, tried to get some
orders. The British guns had ceased firing but he was told to get
his men off the road because their presence would draw artillery
fire. Nicholas moved into the fields west of the road, where he
met Winfield Scott, who pointed out to him the location of the enemy
artillery and the necessity of attacking it. Wood then rode up and
conducted him to a point west of the orchard behind the Peer house.
McRee arrived next and informed Nicholas that the Twenty-First,
on his right, were about to attack the British battery and that
he was to move "to the left and form a line facing the enemy on
the heights with a view to drawing off his force and attracting
his attention." As his company formed up, thirty-four-year-old Captain
John Symmes from the Michigan Territory, concerned that his green
soldiers would prove unequal to the task, scrutinized their faces
closely while giving them "a few exciting words" and was reassured
by the resolve he saw reflected there.
Although Brown's intention had only been for Nicholas to mount
a demonstration, his order must have been garbled in transmission
because the Virginian led his regiment straight at the British artillery.
From their position on the hill, Maclachlan's gunners could see
little of the southern slope and the fields in front. The smoke
of battle had cleared and the moon was low in the southwest sky,
but it did not illuminate the lower slopes the hill, which were
shrouded in darkness. The gunners could, however, clearly hear the
shout of orders and the sounds of marching troops as Ripley's brigade
deployed and occasionally they would fire a round to the Americans
on the qui vive. ....... Aware that something was happening to their
front but uncertain what it was, Maclachlan and his men loaded their
guns and waited.
As the First Infantry advanced in line out of the darkness in
front of the British guns, Maclachlan opened a furious fire with
canister and round shot. Fortunately for the Americans, the British
gunners' elevation was too high and most of the rounds passed harmlessly
overhead. With Nicholas and his adjutant, Lieutenant John A. Shaw,
both mounted and urging them on, the First moved closer to the British
guns. The gunners corrected their aim and now the Americans began
to take casualties ...... As the fire intensified, Nicholas realized
that it would be suicidal for his tiny unit to attack straight into
the muzzles of the British guns. Concluding that there "was no possibility
of my annoying the enemy and a certainty of his destroying my men,"
the Virginian ordered the First Infantry to "right about face" and
march back down the hill. Ignoring a staff officer who shouted,
"Where are you going?" Nicholas then reformed his regiment in line
at the base of the hill.
Map courtesy
William Constable
|
His abortive attack had not been in vain; it had drawn
the attention Maclachlan's gunners, and in the noise and
confusion of the First Infantryt's advance and retreat,
they failed to hear or see the approach of Miller's Twenty-First
Infantry up the southeast slope of the hill. ......
It was about 9:15 P.m. when the Twenty-First moved quietly
up the hill, in a line of two ranks, with their "bayonets
at a charge ." The muzzle flashes of the British guns firing
at the First Infantry illuminated the faces of the advancing
men and one later admitted that as he climbed he felt "damned
bashful." For much of their progress up the steeper southeast
slope of the hill, the Twenty-First were moving in "dead"
ground and invisible to the British gunners and the infantry
behind them. There were no enemy skirmishers to impede or
warn of their advance and in a few moments they had reached
the old rail fence overgrown with shrubbery that surrounded
the cemetery and the meeting house. They were now about
a hundred feet from the muzzles of the guns and could see
the gunners' "port fires and slow matches burning and ready."
Miller "very cautiously" ordered his men "to rest [their
muskets] across the fence, take good aim, fire & rush."
|
Maclachlan had ceased firing at the First Infantry,
who had disappeared into the blackness at the bottom of the hill.
His subordinate, Mackonochie, had just arrived from the Twelve-Mile
Creek bringing three 6-pdr. guns and the two gunners were probably
too involved in the process of positioning these pieces, while the
gun detachments were intently watching where the First Infantry
had disappeared, to notice the quiet movement of the Twenty-First
to the cemetery fence. The American were spotted at the last moment
- Norton was conversing with two officers when one of them "enquired
what Body of men it might be that were approaching." Going towards
them, Norton "observed the Moon glimmer faintly on the plates of
their Caps, the form of which denounced them to be our Enemies,
- before I could speak, they fired."
The well-directed American volley cut down Maclachlan's startled
gunners so that "not one man at the cannons was left to put fire
to them." Maclachlan was wounded and nearly twenty of his men became
casualties. Before the dazed survivors could react, the Twenty-First,
with Miller and their colours in the lead, pushed the rail fence
flat, charged and were in among the gun detachments with their bayonets.
The "fight was but for a moment" and most of the British gunners
either fled or surrendered. ......
What Reviewers say
about Where Right and Glory Lead!
Graves presents an unparalleled analysis of how this confusing and
complicated night battle unfolded, and in the process deftly cuts
through conflicting contemporary reports, especially on how the British
regained their captured artillery at the end of the battle. [Where
Right and Glory Lead] like Field of Glory, shows that no
one is better than Graves at penetrating the fog and friction of war,
and both of these volumes are must reading for anyone who wants to
understand the military history of the War of 1812.
Donald Hickey, "The Top 25 Books of the War
of 1812," War of 1812 Magazine, Issue 7, September 2007
Amazon 5-star rating
"I would not recommend this book for anyone who has only a passing
interest in the War of 1812 but for those who already know of the
rudiments of the war and desire a more in depth analysis then it is
fantastic. Graves leaves nothing to be guessed at. The narration is
in great detail, almost to the point of being cumberson, but in the
end, it is all worth it."
Jeff Scott, Amazon Reviews
"With the revisions that take into account recent scholarship, Where
Right and Glory Lead! is now more than ever the definitive account
of the Battle of Lundy's Lane."
Doug Gates, Canadian Military History,
Spring 1999
"Lundy's Lane is one of those battles you know about, but really
don't know about. ...... What author Graves has been able to do is
sift through a mountain of primary written material" to "craft a highly
readable and convincing account of events."
Fred Gaede, Military Historian, Fall
1999
"a vivid and scholarly account of ... a desperate and extraordinary
night battle, written by a master of the military techniques of the
day ... an enjoyable and compelling read."
Piers Mackesy, author of The War for America,
1775-1783
"An excellent tactical study of a Napoleonic period battle."
David Chandler, author of The Campaigns of
Napoleon
"how military history should be written -- deeply and carefully researched,
salted with common sense, and put in a prose that stands you in a
firing line that is fraying thinner by the minute."
John Elting, author of Swords Around a Throne
"an exercise in military history at its best."
Dennis Showalter, History Book Club
"comprehensive and compelling ...... Meticulously documented, cogently
argued, this book alone will secure Graves's reputation among military
historians."
James Elliott, Hamilton Spectator
"The battle is told in great detail, and the key characters enter
and depart from the scene in a fashion characteristic of great historical
narrative. ...... it is a matter of celebration of find a superb history
of one such battle ...... an excellent example of the 'sharp end'
of military history."
Barry Gough, Canadian Military History,
Autumn 1994
"Graves is also a master of detail. He has marshalled thousands of
facts into one coherent picture, judiciously mixing an impressive
knowledge of all things military with anecdote and even dialogue taken
from the diaries, memoirs and official records of a surprising number
of men who partook in the actual battle. The voices of the dead speak
for themselves; their words give the book a welcome ring of authenticity
and human intimacy. ...... read Donald Graves's brilliant and exciting
and sometimes surprising interpretation of the greatest battle ever
to have taken place on Canadian soil. His book is a rare and welcome
achievement."
Michael Power, Brock Review, 1994, No.
3
"Graves narrates a complete account of the battle in a highly readable
style. ...... Graves's notes on the terminology of the period are
neither pedantic nor pedestrian, the accompanying maps are perfectly
placed and executed ... and his eyewitness accounts are intuitively
chosen, each ringing true."
Ian McCulloch, Beaver, October/November
1994
"Through diligent research and an ability to look upon the events
with a detachment rarely seen in an historian writing about the history
of his own country, Graves has stripped away those layers of legend
and has allowed us to see the battle as it really was for the first
time. ...... the definitive work on the Battle of Lundy's Lane and
all that have preceded must be measured against it. ...... a must
read for history buffs and the casual reader alike."
Robert Foley, Weekender, 30 October 1994
"entertaining history that delves into what made both armies of that
time tick. It is as much an account of soldiers in battle as the battle
itself."
Fort Worth Daily Republic, 25 April 1994
"a most lucid description of weaponry, drill, equipment, and unit
terminology ... augmented by clear, uncluttered maps. ...... It will
be the chief source work on the battle for years to come. General
readers, undergraduates, and above."
L.E. Babits, Choice, February 1994
"evokes, even more than Keegan, the full texture of a battle and
its relationship to the conflict of which it was a part. Graves's
devotion to this particular event is evident in the extensive research,
textured prose, and deft analysis that engages the reader."
David Skaggs, Journal of the Early American
Republic, Spring 1994
|